How is Being Gay or a Virgin a bad thing..?

This brings me to a new topic: Evolution. In its science, evolution is a process where a species of organism develops new or previously unused genes, either environmentally or through reproductive processes, in order to adapt to that environment. However, these adaptations are not always ideal, and do not always have a positive impact on the advancement of a species, in the worst case scenario, leading to the extinction of that species.

During pre-historic times of the early development of the species homo-sapiens neanderthals, there is an assumed, by most of the scientific world, split in the evolutionary path, where one set of homo-sapiens remained of the neanderthals class and another, new class of homo-sapiens, called homo-sapiens sapiens, was produced. Though neanderthals had superior physical strength and agility, the sapiens-class had a higher intellect and the ability to create tools and adapt their communication rapidly. They also had superior hunting tactics, leading to the dominance of the sapiens sub-species versus the neanderthals.

Eventually, neanderthals became all but extinct either through being killed by homo-sapiens sapiens or breeding into the class so that the genes of the sub-species homo-sapiens neanderthals were so diluted over time that they no longer had any impact on the major development of the species. It is uncertain but hypothesized by many scientists that the underdevelopment of primitive nations in modern society, as well as those that were severely underdeveloped throughout history, could potentially be linked to remaining dominant genes in the brain and body from the sub-species neanderthals, in such minute amounts that these developments will never be positively confirmed by biologists nor anatomists.

Back to the superior innate potential for development of communication of the sapiens-class homo-sapiens, in ancient times languages were formed by those groups of sapiens-class homo sapiens whose environments and communities allowed them to develop exceptionally dominant intellect genes, forming in the brain at early ages in many of the most advanced ancient civilizations. This allowed them to form powerful nations through their communication, which brought diplomacy, superiority in battlefield prowess, and trade dominance which allowed their people and military to prosper.

However, many of these nations hit some dead-ends in the development of their communication, which many scientists theorize is due to a lack of genetic development, which is normally created over a single generation or several as the need for advancement arises. Thus how many powerful empires in the ancient world have fallen to pieces in short amounts of time to the conquests that they could not possibly have been prepared for.

As ages advanced so did cultures and the values of people, as well as the average intellect of people who belonged to prestigious nations. During times of peace, intellectual pursuits became not only a pastime, but nearly necessary for the many inspiring inventions and technological innovations that lead to the world as we know it today. A large minority of scientists have hypothesized that the development of nations was highly driven by politics and diplomacy between nations, as well as warfare and militant advancements, up until the end of the industrial era. The support for these hypotheses is shown in nearly every major war that occurred in Europe during the 1600s and early 1700s.

However, when a society developed to its peak, so did its values. A grand example is how the once mighty Empire of Great Britain slowly fell to pieces by due-process of its own system and from internal conflict that occurred at times when external conflict prevented the nation from quelling its own problems. The prideful nation had thought itself to be nearly invincible in warfare at its peak, but because of the many mistakes created by underestimating the capabilities of their enemies and overestimating the skills of their own forces, they soon fell to pieces through several ground-breaking wars between the mid 1700s and early 1800s.

As such, their evolution into a nation of pride who believed that it held undisputed power lead to its eventual downfall. Thankfully by this time, the development of morals in humanity had evolved to a level where we would not completely destroy a nation that was our direct enemy (IE, America had chances to destroy Great Britain twice and chose to forego the opportunity), because we believed that further bloodshed was meaningless and will not solve the problems that many believed caused the conflict. Society changed drastically, leading to evolutionary changes in the ideas of culture.

....I want to say a lot more, a whole lot more but my hands are tired from typing for about thirty minutes so I will leave it at that for now, and pick up later.