Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
PersonDude wrote...
Your comment that humans think they are superior sickens you also nagged at my attention. Even wild animals feel pride and there is nothing wrong with displaying your achievements. I have doubts about humans being the most virtuous but the fact that we are the most intelligent of all the species is true and it seems to me we do have the right to call ourselves dominant after looking at the planet.
My personal view is we are the dominant species because we can adapt better than any animal. If we were to give a letter grade on different aspects of survival. We get a C in everything but, we get an A+ in adaptation. We inhabit every corner of the earth every hospitable and inhospitable environment. No other animal has been able to do that.
Adaptation, in a nutshell, is any change in the structure or functioning of an organism that makes it better suited to its environment. Typically, we change our surroundings to better suit us. Since we've begun developing technology, we've haven't had much need to "adapt."
PersonDude wrote...
Also, why do you find the words "my species" irratating? There seems to be nothing wrong with it. If you are human you have the right to call yourself a part of the entity known as the human species and it seems "my species" is perfectly okay.
I agree with this. What is wrong with referring to the species that I belong to as "my species"? I refer to my family I live with as "my family" the same goes with everything else. So where is the problem?
Your family and the human species are two different cases. When you're talking about your family, you would normally say "my family" when talking to people who aren't related to you. However, when you're talking to other people about the species, you're talking to another member of the species. That being said, its more suitable to say something along the lines of "our species."
The Jesus wrote...
Now with that out of the way, it seems to me you don't understand the concept of the food chain. Its an ecological system that is illustrated through the feeding habits of species in that particular species. I suppose you can say we are at the top of
a food chain, and the operative word being "a" seeing as how we eat whatever the fuck we want. Its not the fact that other species are unable to eat us, its that we've isolated ourselves in a society where it is highly improbable that we will be eaten by another species. If we were in the wild, it would be very difficult to maintain this "top of the food chain" status, as members of the species are being dragged off by packs of wild animals for sustenance on a daily basis. In the way of animals, the majority of our diet consists of either herbivores or omnivores. I'll admit, we do eat some carnivores, but some such as big cats and wild dogs aren't exactly popular items on menus at restaurants. The fact of the matter is that many carnivores that can be classified as man-eaters turn to eating humans as an easier method of getting food when they are either injured, there is a shortage of their normal prey, or when illness or natural physical ailments hinder their abilities. That being said, I'd highly doubt that any human is rightfully "at the top of any food chain."
Hey, thanks for repeating my high school biology teacher. Your assumption about my knowledge of ecosystems and food chains was wrong, I actually passed my biology and my ap bio classes with A's. Though I should have been a little more clear about what I was saying in relation to the food chain. I guess I meant "top" as in we are the dominant predator and no other animal actively hunts us.
Most true predators don't even consider humans as prey unless they're not physically unable to hunt their natural prey, I believe I already said that. Just because we aren't actively hunted doesn't mean we're not on the menu. The thing is that the majority of human ecosystems are isolated from nature and humans typically avoid areas where there are animals that would hunt them. I'm not saying you're completely wrong, I'm just saying that you're not taking into account the whole picture.
Like I said, as a species we are predators, that's something I won't deny. We are apex predators, but that is only because of the circumstances in which we live. Mankind has only found its dominance in these ecosystems because we are, essentially, the ones who built them. Basically, we eat animals that we specifically raise to slaughter, not hunt. However, that's all beside the point. The reason I am so critical of our position as predators is because in our day to day lives, we do not rely on predation for survival. The humans that do actual hunt their food on a natural basis, we have come to refer to as savages. Our classification as alpha predators, by definition is situational. If we were placed in another ecosystem, our dominance would most likely be overshadowed by predators that are more conditioned to hunting on a day to day basis. Realistically speaking, the vast majority of humans, without all the technology that we've come to rely on to make our lives easier, are in a shitload of trouble.
Getting A's in classes doesn't reflect actual knowledge. I passed my bio classes too. I didn't get A's, but that was because I wasn't there half the time, but if I was I would've. You don't learn everything in school. I won't sell you're wisdom short, you could know everything there is to know about the subject, but by the way you talk, it shows a very restricted understanding.