This is an open thread for discussion about why some users on this forum are atheists. By contrast, it is also a forum for people who are not atheists.
I desire atheists to tell, as succinctly and as specifically as possible, WHY they are atheists.
I also desire non atheists, or rather, theists, of all sorts, to, in detail, and specifically, explain WHY they are theists.
This thread is not about religious debate. This thread is not about why I think YOU should be an atheist, or why you think I should be a theist, this thread is simply about describing why we are, what we are. I urge everyone here not to debate these points and reasons, as I will create a SEPARATE thread for exactly that. This thread is going to simply be a reference point for Fakkuers when it comes to arguing points. For if you...default...on a reason you give in this thread, then you have officially changed your mind about a fundamental reason why you are what you are. And sometimes the only way to REALIZE this is...if you read it for yourself.
I'll start it off with my own...telling.
I could be boring and non descriptive and say, "I'm an atheist simply because I see no reason to believe". However I want to set an example for the rest of the posters here, so instead...well...here goes.
There are a few frameworks, or methods of description in how I can tell why I am an atheist. There's the historical set, the progress of my reasoning, what maintains my reasoning now(which is probably, I think, something distinct from my progressing reasoning) And I'll get to those in a second.
The REASON I'm an atheist is...I don't believe in god.
I like peas, I hate cauliflower and I like swimming. I like things that bring me pleasure and I don't like things that bring me pain, or annoyance. Though I know these things are often times necessary.
I like peas, and I don't believe in god.
I know how to describe the world, through the context of someone who believes in a god. I know how to describe the world, the things about the world, through the eyes of a believer.
I can do these things, these things are easy for me but...I don't like to do these things. Even moreso, it doesn't mean that I even LIKE these things. Sometimes it's helpful, and sometimes it's useful to do things you don't like but it's not constructive to focus soley on those things.
And that's the difference between an atheist and a theist. The way we perceive things. The way we DESCRIBE things. For instance: Evolution vs. creation. People are capable of seeing evolution through the eyes of a god, theistic evolution, god guided evolution. There are many who say science is not at all at odds with their belief, with their religion and that's fine. But there are also others who say that god did things another way, a specific way, and are only capable of seeing god do things that certain way.
This isn't a shot against only theists mind you, atheists and theists do this...narrow categorization of how things must be, there is nothing about being an atheist that renders you immune to such fallacies. This is the case for everybody, we all take our words far too seriously. Way more seriously than we should. Wittgenstein writes about language games and grammatical settings. Things like free will, determinism, cause and effect, these things are only evident to us in our grammar. It is our grammar that suggests there is a cause, an action and an event. A subject, verb, object. Our language is structured, and other languages have different orders of things but I wonder if people who speak with a different orature like object verb subject...I wonder if they see causation differently. And if they did, they saw it back in the day when scientific observations were not widespread, when translations weren't widespread, when physics wasn't widespread in Newtonian and Einsteinan and Quantum ways.
It's not our fault, it's just the way we do it. There are certain christians, certain muslims, certain atheists that take the way they speak of things seriously, as the case. So we end up thinking as we describe the world, and the beginning of the universe as it was...we take this description seriously. The manner of speech, the poetry, the flowery grammar. We take it seriously and it leads us into all sorts of problems. This contributess, I think, to the dichotomy between atheists and other theists, and even between certain theists.
So we're talking about why I'm one of these and not the other. I not only do not usually speak in a religious way, but I also don't, and I make certain of this, take it seriously when others do, like faith, like god, like grace, like holy.
As far as REASONING is concerned, that's why I'm an atheist.
Anyhow, the history. I was a christian. I believed in a 7 day creation and that the world was 6000 years old I did not believe in evolution and I was a devout christian. And things started to change when I entered my teen years. And this isn't because my parents were commanding and I needed to rebel it's just that I was...a teenager. So I took other people's expectations a little more seriously. I went into a bit of a culture shock. I had to explain my 'faith' differently as new things are presented to me. I was a republican, for example, not for any reason but because that's what my parents were. MY dad hated Bill Clinton so I was against him. I didn't really CARE about him to be honest I just...socially pressurized in accordance to my parents first, and then to my surroundings later.
My views on Christianity changed as I encountered people who differed in their beliefs from mine. And as I encountered these people my beliefs HAD to change, if only simply because I encountered them.
I began to idealize fiction. Christian myths seemed...dull and dry to me now. I enjoyed Celtic myths more, Greek Gods and myths, and I wanted to embrace that myths, so I started to research to try and become a pagan.
At this point I still believed in miracles and magic. So I would find other people that believed in...magic. Anton LaVey comes to mind. His work inspired me, though in a silly way I suppose, to start to make other people around me think, to make them wonder. A love for philosophy grew out of my reading...The Satanic Bible. LAter on I entered into my current mindset of taking some descriptions seriously and others not, and God became just another way to describe things.
I lost the desire to describe things...in the way of...gods.
And with my loss of desire to describe things in the way of gods came my loss of a desire to live my life within the context of any god's existence. In essence, later on I lost interest in describing and living in the manner of believing in a god. This loss of interest later on compounded with more reasons, though not reasoning, such as problems I see in the way of describing things through certain monotheistic terms, through theistic epistemology, the failed justifications of presuppositions. So I suppose once I actually actively took a stance besides my social pressures, the reasons began to compound in my grammar and my descriptions and my words...and...I became what I am now. When exactly I specifically became an atheist...I have no clue. I couldn't tell you.
TL;DR, the reason I'm an atheist, is because that's how I talk, and live my life.
Everyone have fun with this. This particular thread I won't be arguing in...just reading.