Rbz wrote...
What, your desktop can't handle that job?
It can, but not wirelessly and not as smoothly as I would be able to do it with a joint-multimedia hub. For example, my TV has two HDMI outputs and my desktop has one HDMI and one Display Port for as HD input/output. This means I either have to change my cables or go buy an adapter if I want to have both my HD comp monitor and my TV plugged in at the same time, and I can't use my regular dual-monitor setup either way.
A Boxee-box can wirelessly stream HD from my network HDD or computer to my TV without the need of cables. The same goes for audio, since the audio from my desktop to my TV is run through HDMI via my amplifier I have to swap between my desktop-speakers and my HiFi-system.
Now, I wouldn't go out and spend half a fortune on setting this system up, because, it's not
that big a deal, but that doesn't mean I would actively avoid a simple way to do it when I see no problem with it. Not to mention if that voice-command system works as smoothly as it did during the presentation, bring it on.
Rbz wrote...
You want to buy a media platform with strict restrictions on how you consume your content? Fine. My fucks on this matter were spent elsewhere. It's also not always on, so people with shit connections shouldn't shit themselves just yet. However, our objections to the "check in with us daily" feature is that it's the same anti-consumer drm policy that gamers went apeshit about during the simcity debacle. I don't know about you, but I don't want to have to ask permission to be able to play my games; some people have principles. What do we do about it? We deal with it, of course. It's not very difficult. Not buying this farce of a machine takes no effort. As you've seen in this thread, other people had no trouble dealing with it by contemplating purchasing from Microsoft's competitors.
Daily check ins are still just speculation, but you'll have to be online from time to time. For someone like me, with a constant and functioning connection that I wouldn't turn off anyway having to be online once in a while is a piss in the ocean, my other devices updates on a regular basis, why wouldn't my consoles do the same?
I don't really get the "asking permission" and "strict restrictions" parts, as I don't see where either comes into place. I have to log into my steam account, and my Xbox live account, and my PS3-profile etc to use my games anyway, so what's the difference?
Rbz wrote...
If I was a conspiracy theorist, I'd say that Sony and Nintendo collaborated on a joint "Fuck Microsoft" project by having a small group infiltrate the top management of M's Xbox division and have them propose daily check-ins, mandatory kinectivity, one account per game and lots of fucking TV. That would be one hell of a way to remove a competitor from the game industry.
Mandatory kinect isn't really mandatory, it's a feature you can use like any other, and since the kinect ships with the console I really don't see the problem here, don't fucking use it if you don't like it. One account per game is a bit bitch, but hardly strange. Lots of TV is obviously because they're bringing a new feature to the console market, are people really that surprised that Microsoft choose to talk about the console-features instead of games when E3 is less than a month away?
I also want to know more about that cloud-power thingymajig they were talking about, putting processing power and render features in the cloud is fairly revolutionary and damn impressive if they do it right. THAT would however require a constant connection while playing a game that utilizes it.