ChatmanJay wrote...
I'm still new to this scene in general so I'm kinda having a hard time completely understanding what this all means. I understand the removal of controversial stuff from the site, but what makes a manga or doujinshi unlicensed? Is it stuff that's being sold officially that people are uploading scans to the site?
Thanks for any replies, I'd like to understand what most are upset about. Again I've only been on the site for a few months so it's not really effecting me, but I've both two books from the site already and glad to support the artist.
Doujinshi can be licensed, if they're completely original, or so I'm led to believe. Those works usually aren't called doujinshi, however. When people use the word doujinshi, 99% of the time it means parody material related to anime/games/mangas/etc., all of which are unlicensed. Typically anything that isn't a parody isn't called doujinshi, they're just called original mangas because they can be published, and that's all you do find in published works by manga publishers. It's a bit confusing the way it's thrown around here.
Like, this is a manga: https://www.fakku.net/manga/love-forecast-english
And this is a doujinshi: https://www.fakku.net/doujinshi/anehama-english
The only difference is that "manga" means it's formally published in an actual magazine by a manga publisher, and a doujinshi isn't. Though in essence they're pretty much the same thing.
Yes, you read that right. There will be no doujinshi related to parody material on anime/mangas/games/etc, nothing of that sort.
Jacob wrote...
WitnessX wrote...
Okay, let me see if I have this straight: Any original doujinshi done by artists Fakku works with (and obviously original manga) are fine, but we're gonna lose the parody doujinshi (stuff for series that already exist, e.g. Bakemonogatari, Infinite Stratos, Is It Wrong to Try and Pick Up Girls In A Dungeon)?
Not gonna lie, that's a downer.
It's unfortunate, but that is what will eventually happen before the end of the year.
https://www.fakku.net/forums/feedback-suggestions-and-support/discussion-unlicensed-content-removal/page/4#4472449