mibuchiha wrote...
And so we agreed: fuck judging.
Ahaha, I leave for an hour and this is what it has come to lol.
high_time wrote...
Again I have to agreed with you on that one, I don't really care about the grammar/typo if at least I could understand the message. This is not English class for goodness sake~
It kind of bugs me why the judges are divided into specializations : Plot, Writing Structure / Grammar, and Poetry. Why not choose three people with all-rounder capabilities instead?
Furthermore I'd say the judges should have similar range of capabilities as an author and reviewer, and the most important thing is diverse set of personalities, when really different minds could work together we could conclude that their judgement is at the optimal objectivity
Well, this post hits a lot of point that you two were talking about. But, honestly, yeah, grammar errors shouldn't be the single thing that a judge focuses on, which I'm sure they don't, but it's important that if a writer is able to improve on it, then he/she should. If a writer cares as much about the meaning of their writing as much I look forward to understanding their story/meaning, then they should be able to put the effort in to improve.
Rather than three all-rounders, I do agree that there should be specializations. That means that each person can provide more insight and thought into what they specialize in. It's the same reason why a a person in a basketball team focuses on being a center, or a point-guard. Or, in a League of Legends team, a person focuses on playing support, or ad carry, etc. I mean, the examples are endless; specialization is generally a good thing.
And, if everyone is at the same level of writing, then there would be little to no improvement =/. Everyone's work will just be good, and nothing would be great. I think there should be a range of level differences. Maybe have a person at an 'average' level of writing since sometimes, a person can understand the story better if they are at the same level. But also have a person with a 'higher' level of writing to help in improvement.
And, I'm sure not every judge is super stiff. They might be good writers, but I'm sure those who judge have their own personalities. Having someone like Xenon, who I view as flexible and connects with the community, and having someone like CoffeePrince, who I view as stiff, but a very strong critic, can be beneficial. Like you said, the wider range of personalities, the closer you get to objectivity/a larger range of views to discuss.
Edit: Seeya 'round Mibu~