ecchigaijin wrote...
nateriver10 wrote...
ecchigaijin wrote...
nateriver10 wrote...
OsamaBeenLagging wrote...
I understand what legalizing pot. But what I was trying to point out what type of rules that should be set.
Osama loves weed. :)
In that case you shouldn't have phrased it the way you did. I'll take a Grammar Nazi stamp if you have one but if, the way your comment is structured, it implies what I said it implied.
Don't worry too much about Nate's "grammatical structure" comments, Osama. They can come out for any reason. Like if he doesn't understand there are multiple meanings of the term "committed".
And you don't understand that if there are multiple meanings to a word then you have to make it absolutely clear which meaning you want so that the other person pefectly understands you.
Perfectly. And no. If you go about judging other people on their English, it pretty much removes all need for me to explain the meaning of every word with more than one meaning, because surely someone without a full grasp of a language wouldn't go about telling other people they're doing it wrong. Would they?
You two calm down and hit a blunt, the last thing we need is another grammar argument (which is always a nice fapping material for me, but no), on the topic of weed no less. Now, someone here cares for the fact that California catatonic weed is going to be legalized? Anyway, on the point of marijuana, have you ever seen someone drive recklessly and kill people when their high on weed, or die of lung cancer because of it? Just saying.
P.S. I'm sitting here at 10 at night eating Frosted Flakes, guess what I'm smokin!?