U.S.A Opinion

Now I want you guys to think real hard about what you are saying. If U.S didn't get Japan emperor Tojo into submission, he would still committed genocide to his own people and seeing that it would spread down to the next generation. It would have never stopped if not for the U.S intervention.

Now, you guys were talking talking about how the U.S only fight wars when it's beneficial to us. That is not always the case when you take a look into the somali war in Africa. The U.S didn't fight that war to be getting benefits from the land. They fought out of their own free whim. They gain NOTHING in return for that except praises among the people residing there. The only fight we started was the Iraq war and the Vietnam war. That was it! So the next time you want to basically say that every U.S soldiers died for nothing. I strongly suggest you re word or get information from google because that was never the case.

I'm serious bro. Back in 1950s blacks actually died for good moral reasons but now they die from gangs and words. I hate how America is right now. I made this thread to see how others around the world view this country because I view the economy as crap, most people are crap, gov't is getting corrupted and I'm patriotic. I love this country for what it stands for before all of this! Even if people around the world don't agree with the passed wars and stability of this country as it is now. They can't disagree that our founding fathers did in fact create a great if not the best country known to man.

This was your biggest mistake when creating this thread. You will get some good opinions from other people, like myself, who do not live in america but have experienced america's influence on the world in some way. But our opinions are dwarfed by the american egotism that nearly all americans have. You can see it almost instantly in this thread, post your opinion saying that you don't like america and BLAM BLAM BLAM! a thousand posts about how you are the stupidest person alive and have no clue what you are talking about.

It's an opinion. No one here should be criticizing anyone for their ideas and such. If you have evidence of such thesis then by all means use it. I didn't make any mistakes while making this thread because people around the world don't view America like I do so I wanted to know what the fakku family thought in the matter. But yea, I do agree that people here are really getting off topic.

Really because you first provoke Japan into war because you are facing the biggest economic crisis in US history. War would be the solution (it clearly was the war dragged you out of that pit) so you need a reason to join, Japs attack the US and you suddenly have public support to joing this war.

You litteraly wiped 2 major cities of the map, that can never be justified it's one of the worst war crimes ever commited. The US went apeshit over 9/11 that was one large building not even close to 2 cities.
SO don't try to bullshit about how much you did for Japan, you hurt those people more then Tojo could ever hope to do and they will never forgive you for it.




You made a complete mess out of Somalia and then got out as fast as you could, in the end you didnt solve anything and you didn't help anyone. No citizen was thankfull for that. The US armed somalia during to cold war and left it angry and with the tools to destroy itself.



Sorry bro but I got bad news for you

Well atleast their mothers got a medal and government support that's something, Other then that honestly all the US soldiers after WW2 died for no good reason, they didn't have to be sacrificed.

But if the US is good at one thing it's glorifying their military and you can clearly see that it has affected you a great deal.
I find it funny that most Americans always say how great their military is and how their soldiers are heroes. My one response is your government send those young men of to put the world on fire and told you they were heroes. All those suicide bombers also think they are heroes, never forget what propaganda does.
A man should not die because his government needs soldiers.



You really don't get what TheOtherJacob told you do you?

I suggest you look at the world around you more carefully cause you are just repeating the propaganda you have probably been hearing your whole life.
Neil young once made it clearer then ever Rocking In The Free World
The US has fallen from glory a long time ago buddy.

Also the french gave you your freedom, not your founding fathers.

Though because of the ineptitude of the current Washington Administration, difficulties exist but This alliance has lasted centuries(including several decades after WWII)

Today, Japan is a member of the U.N. Security Council, for the most part it has avowed from the type of barbarism that disgraces humanity. In my mind, as a Nationalist I believe Japan is playing too nicely according to the Treaty of San Francisco and its cooperation in this regard allows for North Korean/Chinese expansion in the region.

An independent(yet aligned Japan) would serve as a true buffer in Asia and at the same time, a uniting force. Japan is our current greatest ally in the world(contrary to the thoughtspeak of religiously oriented neo cons and equally duped Americans).

If Israel fell, hell if that entire Middle Eastern continent burned in flames, what would we lose? To the contrary, we should be in prime position to acquire oil on the cheap. But if Japan fell, militarized powers would once again sweep through Eurasia and bring a new era of war and colonialism. It's already happening with Chinese expansion towards Central Asia:

See This







Generally speaking, as outlined earlier in this thread there has been a concerted effort to cultivate the African regions on the part of America. Why has that failed? Partly, this is my Social Theory regarding life itself:

"Races" don't exist, but "Social Groups" do, and the African People are such a social group(we're all involved in Social Groups). These Social Groups are neither superior nor inferior to another. But they are different from each other.

These differences aren't negative, and in fact they can be positive. The important factor in relations between different nations and thereby different social groups of people is whether or not those social groups are actually compatible.

We're not so compatible with Africa(and the Africans), for that matter neither are native African-Americans all that interested in the African situation. However, Mexicans, Chinese, etc have shown an active interest in Africa and perhaps they themselves would be better equipped to cultivate Africa.

However, in my Social Theory I identify an even more important factor: I believe that a Nation-State or a community can only be self-cultivated. America was cultivated by our European Founding Fathers. I will address this specifically towards the end of your post(Namely, your diatribe that the french gave Americans our freedom. You can say we're not the best(obviously we can stand to improve), you can say we've violated international premise(though without America international premise at best would've stood on shaky grounds) but I will not permit you to even propose the absurdity that the French are the primary reason for American triumph in the revolutionary war.

The French gave crucial support(a blockade) in Virginia, but make no mistake that Americans fought through the trenches in New Jersey and held the Eastern Frontier.
With only 300 men, Americans fought British Soldiers and German Mercs. And it is with our determination, will and our eye on victory that we were able to do so.

Learn with your own two eyes, the resilience of a Nation State united under American Principles






The military is seen in the eyes of the American Public as more symbolic of the Nation State, rather than as an instrument of war(which, is well ironic). So while support of the U.S. Military is generally high, War as a principle isn't.

And I'd venture it's not so much opposition to war, as it is the reasoning for war, the logistics and cost of the war and whether or not it is truly righteous. Americans, historically have always been self-conscious regarding our image.

I said earlier that Americans have become introverted politically, one of the main consequences of this introversion is the perversion of the mission of the military. Namely, of national defense and not profiteering for the military-industrial-complex and its lobbyists.






At one point in the 50's, America did have one of the greatest manufacturing forces in the world. This manufacturing force, taking advantage of our enriched lands(Which, we really cannot access thanks to Greenpeace and other radical leftist Democrats who no doubt are "well meaning" but whose ignorance is appalling) as well as the sheer size of said lands.

The few politicized forces in the nation, are politicized insofar as social profits are concerned for certain groups, interests, etc and aren't interested in the well being or the prosperity of the Nation State. The very meaning of a "Global Economy" is to sacrifice.

Hence, the otherJacob proclaimed me to be a threat to this self-sacrificial system because I am utterly unwilling to sacrifice America any longer to a predatory system which hardly grants us as much as we put out.

America has also fallen, because we've fallen for the multi-cultural lie in much the same way Europe has. As noble as it might have been, as idealistic as it might have been... The simple reality is that the barbaric Middle Eastern/sub-African nationalities will simply never adhere to, respect or even acknowledge Western culture.

That's not to say those people cannot one day achieve something close(for them anyway) to Western civilization. That's not to say that trade with them isn't impossible(it just needs to be regulated, in terms of its cost, in terms of the benefits, etc.)

But it is to say that civilization, the moment when these warring factions stop committing genocide, getting their heads out of delusions of grandeur surrounding their religion, etc will not come from Western Assistance and probably won't come for quite some time.

Of course, there are several other reasons for the American Collapse, but the origin comes from a disastrous foreign policy. Not, necessarily of policing the world but rather a two faced error:

1: Geopolitical considerations of neither National Economic concerns, nor of territorial concerns or of any possible benefit. But to the benefit of the lobbyists who long for war.

2: The naivety and foolishness of believing in the multicultural lie. We may very well all be Humans, but our cultures hold significance in terms of our individual identities. The only way for a multicultural "world" to feasibly exist is ironically through individual application of cultural pride.

I intend to complete a Political Manifesto for my intentions as an American Nationalist in the heart of America. In my Manifesto, I'll go into greater detail over American Corruption, moral decay and geopolitical and social weakness.

But I shall repeat: Our Founders faced life or death, even before an official declaration of war. Branded traitors by the government they swore an oath to serve, the so-called government divided brothers and sisters of the same common language.

Do not dare say that our great revolution, the wonders of American achievement are due to other nations. They most certainly helped, but the revolution was the greatest act of self sacrifice in European History.

America is self sacrificing? Hardly. America is still the number one consumer of nearly everything on the planet. It's hard to claim that america is self sacrificing giving so much to other nations and sharing so much when it sucks every country that it's involved with dry. America is literally robbing the middle east of all oil and not shedding a single tear over it. America doesn't even care that it's started wars since the second world war, pulled all of the troops out and left those places absolutely devistated.



And this is exactly why you should never be in any position of power, why do the middle east and africa hate american so much that they would go to any length to destroy it, we only have to look at america's involvement in EVERY war for the last 50-60 years. America needs to take some responsibility for it's actions in the world and stop hiding behind it's nation pride like some cowerd under their blankets afraid of the monsters under the bed.



Western civilization is imperfect and a horribly chaotic, unjust, bias and corrupt place to be and take part in. Where money controls everything, nobody gives a shit about their neighbours, and your rights can be taken away at a whim. Where the government constantly tracks everything you do, everything you say for the point of "national security". Nobody would want to have anything like western society because it's broken.



Because dropping the atomic bombs on japan was not considered genocide despite the fact that hundreds of thousands were killed, innocent women, children and men who had nothing to do with this war.



This is percisely the reason why none of your opinions and comments will ever be unbias and balanced. You are an american nationalist, the exact same people all the great minds in human history have been trying to fight against. But it's completely obvious who makes up the american nationalists if you even slightly read the news about america, skin heads, kkk, neo-nazi's, red necks, racists, warmongers, republicans. The right wing machine in full action.

If I was as nationalistic as an average American I would probably say that the Belgians fought the Germans to a standstill for years in the First World War Though it were belgian trenches and there were belgian soldiers they alone stood no chance and it was the crucial aid of other countries that won the war.

In the same thing happend in the American Revolution, the americans were really weak in comparison to the britisch empire. France on the other hand saw a way to hurt them and lessen their strong position. SO they gambled on the Americans, they gave them training, weapons and even soldiers. To think that the war would have been won without the help from france is saying the world war would have been won without the help from the US.

I think this is your problem. You're trying to be a con to what everyone is trying to say but yet you do not have any supports for your argument. You were just talking about how the French viewed its benefit from American soldiers struggle but can you tell me this. Earlier you said that America had always fought war that they knew was benefitical
To them but you never talked about how the French also took advantage of this. See, you're being a con to what we pros are trying to say but you are not talking about how other country use these methods.

Now about that American revolution, the French indeed helped America greatly but they weren't a newly found country that was pretty much mercenaries. Those men went into war knowing that majority of them were going to get killed. Why did they still continue to fight? Well, the thought of making a country were the people actually had a chance to be who they want to be without the suppression of a govt made the volunteers fight even more so hypothetically speaking. Thanks to the charisma and leadership skills of Gen. George Washington and the faces of their families at home is what made the volunteer mercanaries into full spirited soldiers. So do NOT say that the French help was a VERY BIG boost in Americans soldiers because you are only fooling yourself. Those men who died in that war sacrifice a very great deal and that was how we manage to win.

Now do not get me wrong, the French is the closest allies to the Americans but saying that the war was won because of French assisted is like saying that china won its war with Japan because of the Soviet Union intervention.

Just how it was said "before" about "American egotism" there also is "anti-America egotism" and it gets to the point where the hate for America is always seen as justified and America is truly "the really evil place of all time and if you're with them, you're just as bad!" and a double-standard when there are far worse places out there. No one can "defend" America without being vilified anyway.

I'd rather live in Japan, USA sucks monkey balls.

Except you don't know anything about world history at this point it appears, only american history. Or if that's given, you are choosing to ignore world history in favour of mass promoting american history. Don't get my wrong, my family fought the british to free america but with that said, you underestimate what the french brought to america, or should I say, what america brought the french cause lets be honest here, while a nation was founded, the scale of the war for freedom from the british was simply a blip on the map compared the global war that was going on.

This whole thing about the america revolution had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH AMERICA origionally. It was origionally and still today called the French and Indian War, which was the north american theatre of the Seven Year War, between france and england. The french were already at war with the british, the french didn't aid the americans, it was the americans that aided the french by turning on the british. This gave the french a massive advantage on one front which was now taxing the british, it then allowed the french to push forward in europe to reclaim much land lost in the hundred years war. This period actually became known as the Second Hundred Years War between the french and the british. The spanish subsequently also declaring war on england at the same time as the american revolution started, lending money to the americans and troops to the french in europe. This ultimately lead to freedom of america because the british could not afford to send troops to fight the rebellion in north america and the french in europe at the same time.

And it wasn't even long after the american revolution that the french had thier revolution which lead to napoleon taking over most of europe.

So if you want to talk about the actual facts here, the america owe a lot more to the french than they realize cause if the french hadn't been at war with england, and given the american more than a million dollars to help the americans on that front. This is two sides of the same coin, and no matter how you want to look at it, who owes who, it still remains the same coin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolution#France
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Years%27_War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Hundred_Years%27_War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_and_Indian_War

This is typical american attitude, glorifying the military. In this world there are few heroes, war is not heroic sacrifice, war is never people giving their lives for something they stand for. War is dirty, war is good men dieing for some vague idea the higher ups planted to boost morale. This doest mean that the revolution was not of historic significance it just wasnt all heroic like americans make it look. Get it in your head, instead of watching movies like "The Patriot" or "Black Hawk down" start watching "The hurt Locker" and "Apocalypse now" they show the true face of war, not the Heroism you desperatly try to picture.

TheOtherJacob just covered the rest of you post I suppose.

I totally get what your saying and i also think the same way. i think the only reason people do stuff like that now is because there told not to. think about it, women wore clothes and were told that it was wrong to have anything else exposed but now they wearing string. drugs were once legal and right after they were illegal everyone started doing it. people just want to do the wrong thing because its easier than working hard toward a real goal.

Let's see, let's first start off with Vietnam:

We didn't leave Vietnam worse off, we left Vietnam without accomplishing the goal. And the Vietnamese are certainly *suffering* for that. But irregardless of inept leadership they've seen economic production.

Now we'll go into the Middle East Problem in great detail:

First, this problem actually occurs towards the end of the Second World War. Jewish political gamesmanship allows for the Zionists(at first, a small radical faction which has quickly grown to be the greatest political power in Israel) to politically bargain for and invade Palestine(which was held under British Mandate)

America, which by now has been politically capitulated by the Socio-political-economic Zionist forces lent its hand and credibility to the Balfour Declaration, among other treaties which violated a former American stance of "Self Determinism"

Similarly to the political support for the "creation" of Israel(read: The rape and pilfering of Arabic villages), America actually once held very strong ties with Iran. So what happened with these strong ties? We installed the Shah of Iran, a more "pro"-globalist(though he appeared to have enacted some national legislation). But for the most part, seen as a despot and a tyrant the Shah was overthrown in 1979.

So there you have it, if you want to blame the "West" for Middle Eastern problems, blame our problem child and its political complications. This problem child was supposed to be the "beacon of democracy" in the Middle East.

It has been anything but such. It's started wars against its Arabic neighbors(then put the blame on them). Current Palestinian disposition is to such an extent that the very moment Palestinians were to get aid, the U.S. Senate blocked it! The ones who control aid? Israel, go figure.(Then they want the Palestinians to "pay back" that which belongs to them in the first place!)

And the amount of aid is paltry(at best) compared to the hundred of millions our child state is granted. And does it have to pay it back? Not necessarily.

Yes, independent...right **rolls eyes**


No one wants to start the wars of old, but the political capitulation of the American Nation must end. Neutrality from this one sided relationship would actually folster better relations in the Middle East. Israel would be forced to actually consider a Middle East with its Arabic neighbors as yes, neighbors!

Jerusalem should neither be in Israeli nor Palestinian conrol. Instead, it shall be an Independent Capital or the two sides should choose some other part of the nation for their capitals.

The origin of Jerusalem was to be a religious site, the only way for peace to be established in that area is for it to return and remain that way.




A recent case? Iran!

Israel: *Wahh* You're building nukes
Iran: No we're not and you have no subjective proof of this.
Israel: I say you are, so you are! U.S and Allies, sick em!(because despite millions in military aid and U.S. technology they apparently can't negotiate at the table or even defend its own country apparently.)

Yeah, I'm done. A growing minority of National Americans are done. Including a vast majority of Democrats who were rightfully upset at Netanyahu's postering during a U.S. Election! How can a foreign head of state interfere even remotely with the U.S. Process?






I already referenced the history of America's wars(at least the 19th century) and
most of the political contusing forces in those regions are the result of Americans not completing the task, or simply being unable to(see: Vietnam)

The Taliban took hold in Afghanistan and the Opium trade exploded. For all of our "assistance" in Pakistan, we hold about as much shaky ground with absolutely no way to reform those nationalities.

As much as you'd like to espouse nonsense that American "military dominance" is to blame for the world's poverty, that sadly isn't true. We've longed for these dependent 2nd and 3rd world nationalities to develop! They just can't!

No one would like these nationalities to develop more than I(or other first world political leaders). No one would like to see these cultural groups(and specifically, the individuals among them) to for once develop, have a sense of stability, respect and earning power more than I.

The current state of affairs is grossly unacceptable, where these nationalities and these despotic individuals have become leeches on the American Way of Life.(And in general, the European World)

The best thing for America, for Europe, for the World is to declare our neutrality
from these troubled areas and these troubled peoples. They're only degenerating
the world at large.

The End Game will be, the religiously-oriented Middle East will fulfill their own Self-Prophecy and burn themselves in a lake of fire. Then, after such a said war and a few decades later, the Middle East will finally modernize.

You state that "people like me" are hiding under the covers, allow me to reverse the charge. It's "people like you" who still cling to a false notion of "Multiculturalism"(without recognition of whether these cultures could even mesh together to begin with) who hide under the covers.

Look at your own Quebec in Canada.

The Quebec people are stuck between a rock and a hard place. Multiculturalism is such a blessing!


Multiculturalism is not "beautiful", it's an affront to every living Human Being. Including those minorities who love their culture so much as to enforce it on others.

Individuality will eventually lead to cooperation, which will eventually lead to a united world. But a forced collective(IE: Multiculturalism) is doomed to fail from the start.

You cannot have a "diverse yet inclusive" society.

The only reality of Multiculturalism would be those cultures and those people who can naturally coexist. Even those cultures which did not blend, through third party relations with cultures that it did blend with would eventually join the world.

You don't have to have A+B to equal C. You can have "A+ Partial B" to eventually equal C. Through cooperation, individual will and natural alliances is the ideal world.

Our current model is a blatant lie, a lie that you tell yourself so that you can sleep peacefully and look away from the "monster" known as reality.






Did I just get done saying our society was corrupted? I think I did. As such, to infer that the current state of affairs in America are even acceptable or even American in any way or shape or fashion is so false as to be misleading.

Yes, the things you state are the current state of affairs in the Homeland. Frankly, the Founders never intended nor did they desire for a plutocracy in the homeland. However, that's to their mistake of creating a Constitutional Republic(and that, the Republic wasn't affirmed in Law.) The only extent to which they did so, was the Supreme Court and the naivety that the Court would uphold Law.

And I think I've said countless times that Americans in general have politically neutered themselves. I've also said that these are the consequences: Rights being taken away under the guise of "National Security", being tracked, etc. Not only have we politically neutered ourselves but we can't even look outside of the box.

It's not that the third parties are unelectable, it's partially due to corruption in funding as you point out. But it's mostly because of such a centralized "political viewpoint"(insofar as is it political? Or mere incompetence to take the first choice available to you? I prefer to choose the latter in my political analysis. I believe Americans to be politically unintelligent.)

Americans in general tend to attach common denominators(such as "Freedom of speech", or "minority rights" or "conservatism") to political parties(or groups) for this reason(and this reason alone), an ignorant American voter will pick his/her "choice" of Democrat or Republican.

Of course, this same ignorant imbecile is going to be naturally disappointed irregardless of his/her choice. Because above all, the American was stupid enough to believe that either party represented any such ideal to begin with.

Actions speak to results, and the actions of either party doesn't represent the American People.

(See: The Gang of 8). Adoption isn't a wide spread practice(or an openly endorsed one) but we can bring in illegal aliens! The vast majority of Americans in some form, think of this as a good idea!

If Americans made the logical correlation between "More Illegals=less jobs for their children", the policy would naturally reverse. For my part, I'm not heartless and I understand the difficulties that would come with deporting all 11 million of them.

So I'll go with a split, an analysis of the illegals in the country and we'll cherry pick the most devoted, the most capable of the bunch. Say, 5-6 million at best. The other 5-6 million can go kick rocks for entering the country illegally!

If it's found that none of them are sufficiently capable of becoming a Nationalized American, then we'll deport them all. It'll just take a longer time then if it were a shorter number.

But as is the case with Globalization, I'm not sacrificing the jobs of my future children for someone who was neither born here, nor respects our laws and convictions. They should attempt to cultivate Mexico, and/or their independent lands(The Carribeans for example are a great place. They should continue working on it. They can make a heck of a country if they try)

(The Carribeanese people are the next largest illegal immigrants according to Government statistics. But it's paltry compared to the Mexicans. And heck, legalizing the Carribeanese would be incredibly simple an do able. Since we have proof they can cultivate something)









Except, among English Scholars and the American Public this is still an ongoing debate So much for a heartless and evil people that bombed civilians

In addition, it was after Hiroshima and Nagasaki that the U.S. officially took the position of Nuclear Non-proliferation. Treaties have been enacted world wide, mostly under U.S. Guidance.

We're committed to the idea that a nuclear weapon shouldn't be fired again, as the ones who fired the first and hopefully the last ones in Human History.

If you want me to call it Genocide, I'll call it Genocide. But we didn't know the impact of the nuclear weapon at the time. In fact, many military experts didn't even think the bomb would go off.







Do you like generalization? The KKK is dead.(Offically so anyway, mind you there may be a few hundred "supporters"). Skin heads and "Neo-Nazis" in my mind aren't even politically active. Nor did they understand the political concepts behind Hitler's Germany.

Far from a racial outlook, Hitler had a revolutionary(today, it'd be modern outlook). Unfortunately for the rest of the world, this outlook would be clouded by the social prejudice at the time. Born at a later point in history, Hitler would be a political genius and was dubbed as such up until 1936.

National Socialism, or Fascism is the ideal towards the solution of integrating Human Society. By recognizing Human Individualism, with a mutually collective will. You don't even have to call it National Socialism or Fascism.

Europe, in general has always strived for this unification of Human Souls.

I recognize the flaws in what occurred at the time, but I also recognize the greatest political machinery ever formulated in world history that once united all of Europe. It can unite the world, as long as it recognizes individual communities and their value.

Also, you're incorrect. the Founders were unabashedly Nationalist. Not to the Crown but to the English Colonies which they belonged too. Alexander the Great, Napoleon, etc. All great leaders throughout history were Nationalist.

Abraham Lincoln was Nationalist in spite of the Civil War and in fact integration with the South is proof of such. He could've just let the South off(which would have impoverished the South possibly for decades if not for all eternity).

Honest Abe strengthened and revitalized the Republic, making him one of our greatest commanders in chief ever. Thomas Jefferson spat to the British/International Elitists who demanded that we become serfs to their banking system.

To be a Nationalist, is to defend a Nation from a system of subjugation that has tried to enslave Humanity for as long as it existed.

Actually the reason for me not to talk about the world history is because I was focus on the main thesis in which lustyangel was trying to come across and I have gave the right due respect to the French for their undivided help but as I stated before, the war was not won because of the French dominance over the American soldiers. It was won but the goals and determination of both ally parties.

Now about America owing the French. I am pretty sure that America has repayed that debt to France in WWII when they used the lend-lease act and cash and carry act to help the French and British war against the German. Also the allies save the fallen French on D-Day

The americans used the marchallplan and the lend-lease-act to fill their own pockets and strenghthen their own position. Thats what americas involvement in WW2 was all about filling the economic pit the dug during the twenties.
besides the allies doing the amazing job of winning in West-Europe D-Day was a massacre a desperate assault and Nazis would have lost even without D-Day. The red army was coming from the east and Montgomery from the south.

And? Isn't that better than outright giving away one's own assets to the rest of the world? For what benefit? Another nation's "appreciation and thanks?" Lend-Lease gave benefits later on, but at the moment we were spending millions in a war Americans specifically didn't want.

See this

I wish we were more proactive in our trade agreements, in a similar fashion to Lend-Lease. I wish we had a proactive government that plugged holes in a U.S Economy where millions of dollars go to either defunct programs, middle of the road countries or all of the freaking above!

Now is the time for our youth to be educated, to have doors open to them for career opportunities. The only way we can do this, is to replace a "Global Economy" with a Nationalistic outlook.

For Americans, By Americans and Our America.

I don't think that is a problem, I was just saying that he should act like the US is the good guy that comes to safe the world out of Selfless reasons.
And maybe the public didn't want the war but the Government certainly did as it saved their economy. Spending is what they needed to get their economy back on track.

Before the war, the U.S were in a isolation state. They were helping no one but after some consideration from not only the govt but the majority of the American people is how we got into war. We were being mutualism towards both of the ally parties. We benefit from us in return, we benefit from them.