Black Jesus JC wrote...
What legal privileges are
modern feminists trying to gain for women that you disapprove of?
Had to fix your quote for you since you failed to make the distinction that I did.
Abortion & child care related privileges are two common examples. Though, I speak of any law, legal tradition, societal tradition, etc that treats a woman differently than a man.
First, if a couple have sex and the woman doesn't want the child but, the man does, he's S.O.L. despite the child being 50% his property as well. In essence his property will be destroyed and he has no rights nor legal voice in the decision.
Second If the woman wants the child but, he doesn't then he's still S.O.L. for 18 years as he'll be forced to be extortion levels of money in child care while the legal system protects the woman from responsibility.
In other words, the woman can abort her responsibility for a child while the man has no voice in the decision.
Additionally, I believe if such women want equality then they should be fighting for inclusion in the selective service program (the draft) just like men do upon their 18th birthday.
Fourth, during custody cases it is extremely difficult for men to acquire custody of their child as the legal system is primarily on the side of the woman with a pre-existing bias that the woman will be a better parent.
Finally, I believe women should also be punished equally for sexual assault such as child molestation. Yet, the legal system tends to give these women a slap on the wrist when compared to a man in an equivalent situation.
This is a bit nitpicky, but i don't get why who picks up the tab is sch a contentious issue anymore. Personally if i am out on a date, i will offer to pick up the check but if the women wants to pay it i'm not going to complain about it
I'm in agreement, it really shouldn't matter who picks up the check. However in some women expect the man to pick up the check, otherwise he's viewed as "cheap" and generally will be made fun of later for that behavior.