leonard267 wrote...
I have argued with high_time about this before, but I really wonder what is the merit in being forced to complete a novel within a few months? He did say that it poses a challenge to him. As for me if I were to write a novel, I'd imagine most of my time would be about having to do research and a lot of preparation before putting words to paper. All of it very time consuming I would imagine and might take more than a few months.
There is something improper about tasking me to come up with a novel within a few months. I can't help but to feel that the work produced would not be of quality.
PS: Feel free to point out that I don't write novels. Also feel free to point out that my entry for CoffeePrince's event was completed within a few hours.
The problem is that you are looking at it from the wrong angle. It's not about writing a novel within a month, even if that's what it's called.
The purpose of NaNoWriMo is to give you a time frame and a platform with like-minded people to *start* writing a novel.
If you never start, you will never write a novel. The point is to start and get a rough draft done that you can then hone into a proper novel. Nothing should ever be considered "finished" or "final" directly after first writing it.
Writing is a process that takes time.
The problem in your thinking is obvious when you consider what you wrote here:
[...] I'd imagine most of my time would be about having to do research and a lot of preparation before putting words to paper.
Now I know this myself and I know of other people who want to write, but they haven't actually written a single word of the story. Why is that?
Because they spend all their time planning.
That is not to say planning is not important, but you don't write a novel through planning - you write it through writing.