ShaggyJebus wrote...
rbz123 wrote...
Well if they're anything like petit roids(The ones in the doujin made by Tomohiro Kouda in case you didn't know... without the self-destruction shit)then fuck yes. Otherwise fuck no because I'm not going to be in a civil union with something that can't think like a girl, doesn't have it's own personality, doesn't have a family or at least a past. Plus, marriage is just what lets the society know that there's a stupid piece of paper saying that you are married. If I ever feel the need to marry a robot then I won't give a shit what the society says, I'll just pronounce myself married and hopefully the robot will be able to choose for itself whether it will be married to me or not.
@Shaggy What exactly is this Asimov principle?
Google said that they are constrained to the 3 laws of robotics. That it?
Yeah, the three laws of robotics are what I was talking about. I can't remember all three, but one of them was, "A robot can never hurt a human being." That's the important one.
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
For me it would depend on the AI advancement. I mean, as sex toys, I'm sure they will get more and more realistic, and fuckable, but to have a relationship with a robot, it would have to have the same mental function as a real person.