WhiteLion wrote...
lathandien wrote...
why does the pope try to preach his dirty teachings to mindless sheep? Why does he feel like he can tear people away from logic and the inherently apparent? All these stupid religions with their 'teachings' and 'morals' are nothing but grotesque monstrosities. These 'religions' were not meant to survive in an advanced society with cars, and airplanes, and science. The people who use their everyday appliances without even knowing how they work are ignorant enough to believe in something that can't be seen, felt, or communicated with, with any of our 5 senses. People are uneducated, uncultured, and we have created a society so bizzare, where the stupid survive and breed, and the intelligent are shoved beneath the population. It makes no sense. Why should the superior be forced under the inferior? We are inhibiting evolution's progression. Evolution wants the people who can figure things out to survive, while the people who can't understand anything and look to an invisible being for help survive too. Its BLASPHEMY!
Someone comes along and kindly gives an example of exactly the kind of thing I was referring to in my post on page 1.
landathien, I would like to ask why I, mindless sheep as I presumably may be for believing that morality is important for society to function, should have to listen to you preach your dirty teachings to me? If I am indeed a mindless sheep, you will unfairly influence me by promoting to me a system of beliefs other than the one I already possess, which would be very tragic.
Why does he feel like he can tear people away from logic and the inherently apparent?
Why do you say that logic and the inherently apparent are the way to go, so much so, in fact, that trying to put forth an alternate idea in public is dishonest or immoral or otherwise unjustified. Of course, this isn't even a problem if morality is a grotesque construct that serves no purpose.
All these stupid religions with their 'teachings' and 'morals' are nothing but grotesque monstrosities.
Oh, problem solved.
These 'religions' were not meant to survive in an advanced society with cars, and airplanes, and science.
Unless you have a very specific meaning of science in mind, science has pretty much always existed. Why do cars and planes have anything to do with religion?
The people who use their everyday appliances without even knowing how they work are ignorant enough to believe in something that can't be seen, felt, or communicated with, with any of our 5 senses.
Like the existence of dark matter, of the usage of mathematical concepts that are undefinable physically or really?
People are uneducated, uncultured, and we have created a society so bizzare, where the stupid survive and breed, and the intelligent are shoved beneath the population.
Which is why the market values education, doctors, lawyers and engineers make good salaries, and the government employs people who have degrees and job experience.
It makes no sense. Why should the superior be forced under the inferior?
You figure the superior would have figured out how to solve this, what with their superiority and all.
We are inhibiting evolution's progression. Evolution wants the people who can figure things out to survive, while the people who can't understand anything and look to an invisible being for help survive too.
These are mutually exclusive? You can't believe in some god and also be a good mathematician for instance? Leibniz did quite well in mathematics while believing in a god.
Its BLASPHEMY!
Sure, let's stone the non-non-believers.
Okay I edit what I said in the "respect beliefs thread" Whitelion is the exception (If he is a "believer") other than that, the statement stands. Anyways +rep
Okay for my argument let me start off with this question and I want everybody to think about this:
Why do we not teach alchemy, phrenology, flat earth or other "truths" of the past?
The reason is because we have gathered evidence that proved that these "truths" were in fact entinrely wrong or not wholly correct.
Atheist as a whole generally believe in the gathering of evidence to support a claim. If I claimed I could move a box with my mind then people would expect evidence or even a demonstration of this claim.
The mistake that religious people make is that they claim there is a God (non specific God) but, refuse to bring evidence of it's existence to the table. I can prove a penguin exist by taking you to a penguin either in a zoo or in the wild but, the only "proof" religious people (I'll use Christianity for this example) have to their claim is a book that was written over two thousand years ago. This is the adult form of a kids argument of "Air is invisible,etc how do you know its there" or "My imaginary friend exist but, only I can see or talk to them. So you'll just have to accept that it does."
Why do we not accept "Faith" as a reason that God exists? Lets take a look at Dictionary.com's definition of "faith" (As I continue my argument I'll be using definition number two as the base.)
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Faith
1. confidence or trust in a person or thing: faith in another's ability.
2. belief that is not based on proof: He had faith that the hypothesis would be substantiated by fact.
3. belief in God or in the doctrines or teachings of religion: the firm faith of the Pilgrims.
4. belief in anything, as a code of ethics, standards of merit, etc.: to be of the same faith with someone concerning honesty.
5. a system of religious belief: the Christian faith; the Jewish faith.
6. the obligation of loyalty or fidelity to a person, promise, engagement, etc.: Failure to appear would be breaking faith.
7. the observance of this obligation; fidelity to one's promise, oath, allegiance, etc.: He was the only one who proved his faith during our recent troubles.
8. Christian Theology. the trust in God and in His promises as made through Christ and the Scriptures by which humans are justified or saved.
I'll go ahead and ask every Christian on these boards. How is your religion any better than the religions of the past? These include but, aren't limited to Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Shinto, Sikh, Baha'i, Jain, Zoroastrianism, Rastafarian, Scientology, Cao Dai, Tenrikyo, Neo-Pagan, etc. While some of these don't really fit the discussion but, it does prove my point. Nearly every religion since the beginning of society has claimed that their god watches over us, rewards/punishes us based on our actions. Some have disappeared entirely while some are fading yours is no different. In an era where science and reason are the rules of the day Faith has no place anywhere but, within your own heart to guide your own actions of your own life. I do not push my beliefs on others but, if you want me to believe your claim that a God exists then you must bring me tangible evidence. We use evidence in our scientific pursuits, in our laws and courts and yet, we are quested when we demand evidence of a God.
I'll change gears here and change subjects. I personally am an Atheist and I am proud of that. When I was younger I was a Sunday School going, bright eyed little boy until I started developing my desire to know the why's and how's behind the already existing "why's and hows". Religion couldn't provide those answers but science and logic did.
In conclusion I'll answer "Why do Atheist scrutinize Religion"? The answer is because Theist want to play baseball with the Atheists but, want to make the rules up as they go along.